← Many-to-Many Journey

Test 2: Process

That these systems could be collaboratively built with people and organisations who will use them, enabling their design and efficacy

What we tested

  • Curated the group; set the wide and narrow-boundary mission; set the legal architecture
  • Facilitated the group to shape intentions for: principles, ecosystem strategy; governing, learning and organising systems.
  • Led design of the full infrastructure based on the group’s brief. Group reviewed, adapted and signed off designs using Loomio
  • Systems were built and collaborators partly onboarded. Included a shared information portal(s).

What we didn't test

  • Collaborative setting of underpinning philosophies to guide deep codes; collaborative risk mapping or legal form consideration; collaborative mission-sitting
  • Full prototyping of every process step (e.g. rushed through relationship-building and collective sensemaking due to time constraints).
  • Group orchestration after contract signing and kick-off (only partly held after this point)

Deep dive instruments(s):

example
Experimenters logbook

Experimenters logbook

Log book from the legal design perspective of the things tried and tested in the proof of possibility

Readiness: medium
Test status:
Go to tool →
example
Role cards as a way to fluidly distribute responsibilities

Role cards as a way to fluidly distribute responsibilities

An overview of the role cards approach.

Readiness: medium
Test status: once
Go to tool →
tool
Asset mapping to reveal and witness multi-value

Asset mapping to reveal and witness multi-value

Asset mapping tool and process to help shift the value deep code in complex collaborations.

Readiness: medium
Test status: few
Go to tool →
tool
Offer canvas and use

Offer canvas and use

Guide for using an offer canvas as part of a strategy making process.

Readiness: medium
Test status: once
Go to tool →