Necessary self-protection
When there was misalignment parties referred to the contract for authority on how it would be resolved and the contract reinforced multi-polar traps - we ended up in self-protection over mutual resolution
We’ve collected our key insights and alerts or areas to watch out for that relate to this challenge. There is much more detail inside the Field Guide should you wish to delve deeper.
Alerts
We have compiled a list of potential pitfalls and things to be aware of that relate to these challenges. They are drawn from our comprehensive Field Guide and presented here in summary, but you can find more details in the Field Guide.
No alerts available.
Insights
We have compiled a list of insights drawn from our own learnings in trying to overcome the challenges of doing complex collaborations. We’ve presented the insights here as summaries but you can find more detail in our comprehensive Field Guide.
No insights available.
Tools and Examples linked to this Challenge
Here are some tools we used to tackle this problem. They might help you in your own work.
Legal Scope Sensing
A simple flow chart to help analyse the legal scope for innovation in your context.
Test status: no
Deeply coding governance structures: a flow map tool
A tool showing how assumptions are deeply coded into governance structures.
Test status: no
Charting risk flows
A snapshot of how we mapped and understood risk flows.
Test status: once
Structuring a ‘mission space’
An overview showing how we structured and created a legal and governance ‘mission space’ that could facilitate unfurling.
Test status: once
Layers of the Many-to-Many System linked to this challenge
No related layers found.